Former president Donald Trump has nominated Rabbi Yehuda Kaploun, a Florida businessman with deep Lubavitcher roots, to serve as the U.S. State Department’s Special Envoy for Monitoring and Combating Antisemitism. If the Senate confirms him, Kaploun would be the first strictly Orthodox — and the first Chabad‑Lubavitch — Hasid to hold the post.
A Heir to Chabad Pioneers
Kaploun was born in Israel’s Kfar Chabad to families that helped plant the movement on two continents: his paternal grandfather, Rabbi Moshe Zalman Feiglin, opened Chabad’s first Australian outpost, while his maternal grandfather, Rabbi Moshe Yitzhak Hecht, built Lubavitch yeshivot across the United States and once represented the Rebbe at the White House.
After moving to New York, Kaploun gained rabbinic ordination but opted for business and government relations over pulpit life. In 2017 he co‑founded RussKap Water, a company that turns humidity into potable water; the firm won a multi‑year U.S. military supply contract for its “Tiffany” atmospheric‑water generators and now markets in more than forty countries.
Trump’s Trusted Orthodox Surrogate
Kaploun served as Trump’s Jewish‑outreach director during the 2024 campaign and is a regular at Mar‑a‑Lago fund‑raisers. His elevation continues the former president’s pattern of drawing advisers from the Orthodox world: Jared Kushner and Ambassador David Friedman in term one, and now Kaploun for the State Department post.
Warm Praise From the OU, Cool Silence From Chabad
The Orthodox Union issued an immediate congratulatory release calling Kaploun’s appointment “critical at a time of surging Jew‑hatred.” Chabad headquarters, by contrast, has offered no public endorsement, and several insiders told Haaretz they fear that Kaploun’s hard‑right rhetoric and Trump loyalty could alienate donors who see the movement as studiously non‑partisan.
Blowback on Capitol Hill
Democratic lawmakers have already signaled a fight. Rep. Jerry Nadler, co‑chair of the House Jewish Caucus, labeled the pick “absurd and insulting,” citing Kaploun’s claim that Democrats refused to condemn the October 7 Hamas attacks. Progressive Jewish outlets such as Mondoweiss have highlighted his praise for ultranationalist Israeli figures and his depiction of elite U.S. campuses as unsafe for kippah‑wearing Jews.
What the Envoy Actually Does
Congress created the envoy’s office in the Global Anti‑Semitism Review Act of 2004, tasking it with tracking antisemitic incidents abroad, advising U.S. embassies, and feeding data into the State Department’s annual human‑rights and religious‑freedom reports. In 2021 Congress upgraded the role to ambassador‑at‑large, making Senate confirmation mandatory.
Should Kaploun win confirmation he would succeed historian Deborah Lipstadt, whose tenure was marked by a push for a whole‑of‑government strategy and an expanded definition of Jew‑hatred that includes some forms of anti‑Zionism.
Why the Stakes Feel Higher in 2025
According to preliminary FBI data compiled by the Anti‑Defamation League, anti‑Jewish hate‑crime reports jumped 63 percent in 2024, with more than 8,800 incidents — the highest tally since the ADL began tracking in 1979. Total incidents logged since the Hamas massacre of 7 October 2023 now top 10,000. ADLADL University campuses account for a disproportionate share, making the envoy’s public‑diplomacy platform unusually prominent.
The Road to Confirmation
Trump formally transmitted Kaploun’s nomination to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee last week; as of press time, no hearing date has been announced. Capitol insiders expect Democrats to probe his past statements and business ties, while Republicans are likely to showcase the ADL numbers and frame the nomination as overdue. A floor vote could come before the July recess if the committee majority agrees to move him forward. (Procedural details based on standard Senate practice.)
What It Means for Chabad
Chabad’s 5,000 emissaries rely on goodwill across the political spectrum to keep thousands of campus, military and “Chabad House” centers running. Accepting a partisan mantle risks undercutting that outreach model. Whether the movement eventually rallies around Kaploun or continues to keep its distance will say much about how America’s fastest‑growing Hasidic brand navigates a hyper‑polarized moment.
For now, the nomination has opened a rare rift between Trump‑aligned Orthodox activists and a global movement that has spent decades insisting it is everyone’s friend and no one’s party. The Senate hearing — whenever it is finally gaveled in — will reveal whether that balancing act can hold.
I was calmly eating my Belgian fries—perhaps one of Europe’s last undisputed contributions to world civilization—while watching the Flemish channel VTM. The sun was shining, the sky was clear, and that of course meant it was time for a national ritual: discussing climate change on television.
Because nothing pairs better with a warm, dry day than a panel of concerned experts explaining why everything is actually getting worse.
The news anchor, with the appropriate dose of mild existential concern, asked the question of the day: Why is Europe warming faster than other continents? A fair question. You would expect a complex answer about ocean currents, atmospheric dynamics, or perhaps decades of industrial legacy.
Instead, the explanation took a turn that nearly cost me my appetite.
According to the expert, Europe’s enthusiastic green policies may have… unintended side effects. Fewer emissions mean fewer particles in the air—particles that used to reflect sunlight and thus formed a kind of atmospheric “shield.” In other words: by cleaning the air, we may also be removing a protective layer against the sun.
At that moment, my fries became secondary. I was witnessing a philosophical paradox unfolding live on television: Europe, in its moral quest to save the planet, may be making itself more vulnerable to exactly what it is trying to combat.
You would almost expect a Nobel Prize for irony.
And so we naturally arrive at the thought experiment of the day. If fewer emissions reduce that protective layer, then the often-criticized “Drill Baby Drill” philosophy might deserve reconsideration—not as environmental damage, but as… climate management.
Absurd? Certainly. But no more absurd than pretending that complex systems respond linearly to idealistic policies.
After all, Nobel Prizes have been awarded for raising awareness about global warming. By that logic, one might almost expect that someone like Donald Trump would at least receive a nomination for proposing counterbalances—however controversial. When one side of the debate is treated as untouchable doctrine, the other side quickly begins to look like heresy… until reality asserts itself.
Because here lies the uncomfortable truth: nature does not follow ideology.
In life, and apparently also in the environment, everything revolves around balance. Push too far—whether toward unchecked industrialization or toward uncompromising green orthodoxy—and the system reacts. Not with applause, but with correction.
When policy becomes religion, nuance is the first casualty. And nature, unlike voters, does not negotiate. It restores equilibrium.
Perhaps that is the real lesson, somewhere between a portion of fries and a television debate: environmental policy is not about purity. Not about absolutism. Not about moral superiority.
It is about balance.
And balance, by definition, requires more than one force.
Which may well be the most uncomfortable conclusion of all.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Receive Breaking News
Sign up for our newsletter and stay up to date! Be the first to receive the latest news in your mailbox: