In early April 2025, Reuters unveiled alarming allegations against Karim Khan, the Chief Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC). Khan faces accusations of sexual misconduct and retaliatory actions against staff who attempted to bring these concerns to light. This explosive news prompted scrutiny from international observers, yet conspicuously, Belgian newspapers largely omitted coverage of the story.

 Belgium, home to key European institutions and a historically strong advocate for international justice, prides itself on its vibrant media landscape and freedom of speech. However, the reluctance of Belgian journalists, particularly those with politically left-leaning backgrounds, to thoroughly report this issue raises critical concerns about self-censorship and political bias within journalism. It underscores a disturbing trend where media self-restraint, driven by political affinities or institutional loyalty, can inadvertently compromise press freedom and public awareness.

 The International Press Institute recently noted troubling instances of preventive censorship emerging in Belgium, where media outlets either voluntarily or under subtle pressures avoid covering controversial issues involving institutions they traditionally support. The allegations against ICC prosecutor Karim Khan represent exactly the type of scenario requiring robust, unbiased journalism. Instead, the relative silence of the Belgian media appears symptomatic of a reluctance to damage the perceived moral authority and reputation of the ICC, an institution closely aligned with values typically championed by politically progressive voices.

 Such behavior is not without consequence. Self-censorship undermines the very foundation of free speech, limits public discourse, and erodes trust in the media as impartial arbiters of truth. Belgian journalists, by neglecting this critical story, risk creating a dangerous precedent, wherein political considerations overshadow the necessity of holding powerful figures accountable.

 A free press’s responsibility transcends politics and ideology. It demands a commitment to uncovering and presenting facts objectively, especially when powerful institutions face credible allegations. The muted response from Belgian media, therefore, not only betrays their duty to public transparency but also weakens broader societal efforts toward accountability and justice.

 To protect free speech and reinforce public trust, Belgian media must urgently address these issues, reaffirming their dedication to factual reporting and independence from political influence. The case of Karim Khan at the ICC is a litmus test for the integrity of journalism in Belgium, challenging the media to rise above ideological affiliations and uphold the highest standards of journalistic accountability.