The United States has launched the Pax Silica Initiative (December 2025) as a strategic coalition to secure the “full stack” of the AI-era industrial base—critical minerals, energy inputs, advanced manufacturing, semiconductors, compute, AI infrastructure, and logistics.
Its branding invites an historical analogy: Pax Romana was not peace by consensus; it was stability delivered through Roman law, infrastructure, and—when required—force. Pax Americana similarly offered security and prosperity under a US-centered system of defense guarantees, dollar liquidity, and technology leadership. In that lineage, Pax Silica is best read as the industrial charter of a new order: Pax Trumpiana—a “peace” defined by supply-chain primacy, transactional alliance management, and control of strategic choke points.
The architecture: participants vs. signatories
Public reporting and partner-government releases indicate two concentric circles:
1) Summit participant countries (the “8”)
The inaugural Pax Silica summit brought together:
- United States
- Japan
- Republic of Korea (South Korea)
- Singapore
- Netherlands
- United Kingdom
- Israel
- Australia
and reporting also describes the United Arab Emirates (UAE) as present/associated in summit participation.
2) Declaration signatories (the “7”)
The Pax Silica Declaration was signed by:
- United States
- Australia
- Japan
- Republic of Korea
- United Kingdom
- Singapore
- Israel
Separate coverage notes that the Netherlands and the UAE participated but did not sign the declaration at launch.
This split matters: attendance signals alignment; signature implies commitments (or at least a willingness to be bound to a coordinated agenda on investment security, export controls, and supply-chain strategy).
Why Europe is (nearly) missing—and why the Netherlands is the exception
The EU’s near-absence is not a diplomatic oversight. It is the visible outcome of how power is distributed in the AI supply chain.
1) The Netherlands holds a true choke point (ASML).
In the semiconductor stack, very few assets function as global “gates.” ASML’s lithography systems (especially at the leading edge) are among them. In a coalition built around controlling the industrial prerequisites of AI, the Netherlands is included because it is structurally indispensable, not because it is “European.” This is why, from the EU27, the Dutch seat is the one Washington cannot ignore.
2) The US prefers sovereign, enforceable alignment over EU-level ambiguity.
Pax Silica is explicitly framed as an “economic security coalition”—the kind of arrangement that quickly runs into questions of export controls, outbound investment screening, and sensitive-technology protection.
Those instruments are easier to coordinate with states that can move decisively than with a bloc whose competencies are divided across Brussels, national capitals, and courts.
3) Europe’s posture is regulatory; Pax Silica is industrial.
The EU’s comparative advantage has been rule-making. Pax Silica is about the hardware reality beneath the rules: minerals, refining, energy, fabs, compute buildout, logistics corridors, and the private capital that stitches them together.
In that domain, Europe has world-class firms—but fewer levers that Washington perceives as both decisive and rapidly alignable.
4) The Netherlands may be “in the room,” but not necessarily “in the inner circle.”
The fact that the Netherlands attended yet reportedly did not sign at launch underscores the tension: Dutch strategic assets are European, but the coalition’s logic is American.
Europe’s presence, in other words, is conditional—based on utility and compliance, not on partnership parity.
From Pax Romana to Pax Trumpiana: what changed is the substrate of power
Rome’s system rested on legions and grain routes. Pax Americana rested on aircraft carriers, the dollar, and global institutions. Pax Trumpiana rests on silicon, compute, energy, and supply-chain coercion-resistance.
And that is the central point: Pax Silica is not primarily “about AI governance.” It is about who gets to build, scale, and secure the industrial base that makes frontier AI possible—and who must buy access on another power’s terms.
Europe’s strategic dilemma
Europe now faces an uncomfortable choice:
- Remain a “regulated province” of a US-centered AI-industrial order—benefiting from stability and access, while accepting dependency; or
- Convert sovereignty rhetoric into industrial sovereignty—through compute capacity, energy strategy, minerals/refining partnerships, and a coordinated semiconductor expansion that is not merely a subsidy program but a geopolitical posture.
Pax Silica’s membership pattern sends a blunt message: Europe is not treated as a strategic pole—except where a European country controls a choke point that the US cannot replicate or bypass quickly.
I was calmly eating my Belgian fries—perhaps one of Europe’s last undisputed contributions to world civilization—while watching the Flemish channel VTM. The sun was shining, the sky was clear, and that of course meant it was time for a national ritual: discussing climate change on television.
Because nothing pairs better with a warm, dry day than a panel of concerned experts explaining why everything is actually getting worse.
The news anchor, with the appropriate dose of mild existential concern, asked the question of the day: Why is Europe warming faster than other continents? A fair question. You would expect a complex answer about ocean currents, atmospheric dynamics, or perhaps decades of industrial legacy.
Instead, the explanation took a turn that nearly cost me my appetite.
According to the expert, Europe’s enthusiastic green policies may have… unintended side effects. Fewer emissions mean fewer particles in the air—particles that used to reflect sunlight and thus formed a kind of atmospheric “shield.” In other words: by cleaning the air, we may also be removing a protective layer against the sun.
At that moment, my fries became secondary. I was witnessing a philosophical paradox unfolding live on television: Europe, in its moral quest to save the planet, may be making itself more vulnerable to exactly what it is trying to combat.
You would almost expect a Nobel Prize for irony.
And so we naturally arrive at the thought experiment of the day. If fewer emissions reduce that protective layer, then the often-criticized “Drill Baby Drill” philosophy might deserve reconsideration—not as environmental damage, but as… climate management.
Absurd? Certainly. But no more absurd than pretending that complex systems respond linearly to idealistic policies.
After all, Nobel Prizes have been awarded for raising awareness about global warming. By that logic, one might almost expect that someone like Donald Trump would at least receive a nomination for proposing counterbalances—however controversial. When one side of the debate is treated as untouchable doctrine, the other side quickly begins to look like heresy… until reality asserts itself.
Because here lies the uncomfortable truth: nature does not follow ideology.
In life, and apparently also in the environment, everything revolves around balance. Push too far—whether toward unchecked industrialization or toward uncompromising green orthodoxy—and the system reacts. Not with applause, but with correction.
When policy becomes religion, nuance is the first casualty. And nature, unlike voters, does not negotiate. It restores equilibrium.
Perhaps that is the real lesson, somewhere between a portion of fries and a television debate: environmental policy is not about purity. Not about absolutism. Not about moral superiority.
It is about balance.
And balance, by definition, requires more than one force.
Which may well be the most uncomfortable conclusion of all.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Receive Breaking News
Sign up for our newsletter and stay up to date! Be the first to receive the latest news in your mailbox: